Dear Sirs…
TO:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
James Orenstein, Hampden District Attorney C/O James Forsyth DDA
Governor Deval Patrick, Massachusetts
Be responsible as public servants, acknowledge the overwhelming evidence, and arrest the real criminals at Chrysler, US DOT, and NHTSA who were reckless and negligent in the gruesome homicide of an innocent teenager, Skyler Coughlin-Anderson!
In his indictment to the Massachusetts Grand Jury, Deputy District Attorney James Forsyth states, “Specifically, (Rafael Perez Jr. and Joel Nieves-Cruz), on or about November 10, 2013 having a legal duty of care, did engage in wanton and reckless conduct, and by such conduct did cause the death of Skyler Anderson-Coughlin in violation of General Laws chapter 265 section 13.”
It is extremely disturbing that not only are innocent people burning to death in Jeeps but other lives are being ruined when completely blamed for the deaths that occur when dangerous Jeeps catch on fire!
Those two guys might have lost an object from the back of their pickup that night causing subsequent vehicles to swerve but they had nothing to do with the defective design of the dangerous Jeep that caused the fire. Should they be held criminally and solely responsible for the horrific death of the innocent teenager, Skyler?
Overwhelming evidence submitted by Civil Justice Foundation winner and nationally recognized auto safety expert Paul Sheridan of DDM Consulting forwarded to The Center For Auto Safety on 08/20/2014: http://pvsheridan.com/Sheridan2Ditlow-3-20Aug2014.pdf as well as presented in many public documents by both Sheridan and The Center For Auto Safety, prove that there are others who are blatantly responsible for the reckless homicide of Skyler Anderson-Coughlin through their incompetent and criminal actions. As Mr. Sheridan states in his letter:
“A vast majority of the juries that have served in product liability cases involving Chrysler would opt for criminal charges if they were charged with that deliberation. Paraphrasing Senator Blumenthal, the long history of Chrysler and NHTSA provides more than enough evidence for ‘real exposure to criminal liability . . . and appropriate . . . prosecution.’”
We, the undersigned, respectfully demand that the following be charged in Skyler’s gruesome death:
1. Robert Lutz, Former Chrysler President and COO
3. Robert Eaton, Chrysler Chairman and former executive at GM
250 Via Nizza, Turin, Italy 10126
Paul Sheridan placed Elkann on-notice about the Jeep that later killed young Skyler in his letter of March 5, 2013. Sheridan’s letter was hand-delivered delivered to Elkann’s address in Italy. See http://pvsheridan.com/Sheridan2Elkann-1-15Mar2013.pdf
1000 Chrysler Drive Auburn Hills MI 48321-8004
b. In a July 2013 meeting between safety advocates and David Strickland in Washington, DC, he confirmed his knowledge of the dangerous Jeeps by stating, “There are frankly a lot of people who aren’t with us at all from crashes that frankly as you know could’ve easily been walked away from.” (transcript of this meeting can be found at https://dangerousjeeps.com/transcript-july-1-2013-meeting-with-nhtsa/ )
c. On the day he announced the investigation of Jeeps would be closed, he also announced he accepted a position with Chrysler-supporting lobbying firm, Venable LLP.
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590
b. Ray Lahood, over NHTSA, announced satisfaction with the Chrysler decision to do a “customer service action,” insinuating that EA12-005 was not recall worthy, directly insinuating to Jeep owners, that they were never in any real danger – all the while knowing of Jeep occupants that were killed or horribly maimed due to this faulty design. Subsequently Ray Lahood, over NHTSA, never disclosed that this occurred with no prior crash testing to validate the alleged remedy while committing to the trailer hitch façade.
c. In full knowledge of a 13-year-old admission under Safety Recall Notice A-10, that a trailer hitch did not and could not remedy minor requirements of the Pinto-based FMVSS-310, NHTSA announced that they were “satisfied” with the Chrysler insinuation of a trailer hitch being the effective remedy.
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000
b. Amazingly, while Anthony Foxx was still mayor, and prior to his installment as Secretary, he was placed on-notice about the Jeep that later killed young Skyler by Paul Sheridan in his letter of May 3 2013, http://pvsheridan.com/Sheridan2Foxx-1-3May2013.pdf
c. Anthony Foxx, over NHTSA, approved insufficient crash testing conducted from August 2013 to January 2014. Taxpayers funded this illogical testing unlike real world fire-injury and fire-death accidents, seemingly to bolster NHTSA’s PR. The obvious question is, “When did NHTSA become a crash testing agency for multibillion $$ companies instead of forcing them to fund their own crash testing and subsequent data.”
10. Chrysler Group LLC
1000 Chrysler Drive, Auburn Hills MI 48321-8004, 248-576-5741
b. David Dillon who orchestrates Chrysler’s responses to NHTSA in the rear-impact fuel-fed Jeep fire investigations was deposed on 12/21/2011. Chrysler had presented charts and graphs to the public to quiet any suspicions and to convince the public that the dangerous Jeeps are safe based on “million years of use.” In the deposition, Dillon was questioned extensively about some of these charts and graphs. One question: “So even though the Grand Cherokee had the second lowest amount of crashes per million years of use, it had the absolute highest crashes, rear impact fatalities with fire?” Dillon’s answer: “That’s correct.” A more clarifying exchange was: “If you look at the Grand Cherokee, you got less crashes for the Grand Cherokee per million years of use and more counts of rear fires than any other vehicle on that graph, correct?” His answer was, “That’s what’s reflected in this graph, yes.”
c. When asked in a 09/07/2012 deposition about what ensures the safety from fire of the faulty designed Jeeps, former Chrysler employee and fire causation expert, Robert Banta testified, “The tank’s on its own.”
d. Safety defect admissions by Chrysler are indistinguishable from GM (actually facing charges for hiding their product defects and not recalling such in a timely manner).
e. Countless numbers of Jeep-fire death cases have been settled with the plaintiff’s secrecy being required by Chrysler, when the details of these cases should actually be used by the automotive industry to prevent further fiery deaths. Subsequently, more recent Jeep-fire death cases have been diverted to local Chrysler dealerships under Chrysler’s bankruptcy deal with our federal government; thereby, making it next to impossible to track the harm done by these dangerous Jeeps.
f. Not a single Jeep-fire death has been reported in the models of Jeeps that have the fuel tank relocated to the mid-ship position.
g. Chrysler representatives have repeatedly recited to the public that victims have been burned and died in high-speed crashes so wouldn’t have survived regardless of fuel-tank placement but the facts are to the contrary as I witnessed this scenario myself in real life.
h. On Page 3 of the 1985 Chrysler Fuel Supply Systems Design Guidelines, Engineering emphasizes: “The (fuel) tank should be located in a manner that avoids known impact areas, and provides isolation from the passenger compartment.”
i. The list goes on and on!
I do not work in the field of law; however, according to Cornell University Law School’s Legal Information Institute, “Reckless Homicide” is the killing of another person by acting recklessly with respect to the surrounding circumstances when the person is aware of, but consciously disregards, a substantial and unjustifiable risk, constituting a gross deviation from what an ordinary person would do under the same circumstances. I believe these aforementioned gentlemen are guilty of the Reckless Homicide of Skyler Justice Anderson-Coughlin. However, I believe prosecutors like a “sure thing” and as such, something even easier to prosecute seems to be Criminally Negligent Homicide.
Five elements are required to establish negligence:
2. Failure to exercise reasonable care
3. Cause in fact of physical harm by the negligent conduct
4. Physical harm in the form of actual damages
5. Proximate cause, a showing that the harm is within the scope of liability.
Sincerely,
Put your name here by going to this link:
Comments are closed